Always private
DuckDuckGo never tracks your searches.
Learn More
You can hide this reminder in Search Settings
All regions
Argentina
Australia
Austria
Belgium (fr)
Belgium (nl)
Brazil
Bulgaria
Canada (en)
Canada (fr)
Catalonia
Chile
China
Colombia
Croatia
Czech Republic
Denmark
Estonia
Finland
France
Germany
Greece
Hong Kong
Hungary
Iceland
India (en)
Indonesia (en)
Ireland
Israel (en)
Italy
Japan
Korea
Latvia
Lithuania
Malaysia (en)
Mexico
Netherlands
New Zealand
Norway
Pakistan (en)
Peru
Philippines (en)
Poland
Portugal
Romania
Russia
Saudi Arabia
Singapore
Slovakia
Slovenia
South Africa
Spain (ca)
Spain (es)
Sweden
Switzerland (de)
Switzerland (fr)
Taiwan
Thailand (en)
Turkey
Ukraine
United Kingdom
US (English)
US (Spanish)
Vietnam (en)
Safe search: moderate
Strict
Moderate
Off
Any time
Any time
Past day
Past week
Past month
Past year
  1. Economist.com: "Even in a world of polarisation, fake news and social media, some beliefs remain universal, and central to today's politics. None is more influential than the idea that inequality has risen in the rich world. People read about it in newspapers, hear about it from their politicians and feel it in their daily lives.
  2. Was this helpful?
  3. cambridge.org

    Egalitarianism has always been countercultural. Since there have been no developed societies without inequality, there has never been egalitarianism without inequality. Societies have sometimes proclaimed themselves to be equal; certainly, they have frequently claimed a commitment to equality. But inequality is ever present.
  4. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy

    https://iep.utm.edu › egalitarianism

    2. Inequalities can give those who have more an unjust amount of power over others. 3. Social institutions are only fair if there is equality of starting places in society. Inequality can undermine procedural fairness. We can see this in economic competition, inequality of opportunity, and political influence. 4.
  5. Economist.com: "Even in a world of polarisation, fake news and social media, some beliefs remain universal, and central to today's politics. None is more influential than the idea that inequality has risen in the rich world. People read about it in newspapers, hear about it from their politicians and feel it in their daily lives."
  6. andrewleigh.com

    Translating Indigenous living standards into today's terms, one study puts average incomes before 1788 at $1.80 per person per day, not much more than the bare minimum required to sustain life: Angus Maddison, 1995, Monitoring the World Economy 1820-1992, OECD, Paris.Specifically, in benchmark years 1, 1000, 1500, 1600 and 1700 AD, Maddison estimates annual per-capita GDP for Australia as ...
  7. bostonreview.net

    May 10, 2023On the other hand, we might think that inequality is unjust but believe that attempts to alleviate inequality are either infeasible or will make life worse. But both of these attitudes—how I expect the world should be and how I expect the world to work—are expectations that can be shifted by the art of equality.
  8. philosophyintrocourse.com

    Assuming of course that a difference of income between a $1,000,000 dollar a year income and $100,000 a year income does not compromise basic liberties. Rawls thinks we would choose D over B and C because in both B and C there is a possibility that we could end up with an income that is lower than A, the baseline level of equality.
  9. The badness of inequality, he argues, is not merely impersonal -- it is also bad for a person (albeit in a non-well-being affecting way) to be unfairly less well off than others. Furthermore, while inequalities in final well-being (also known as "ex post" inequalities) are bad, inequalities in expected well-being (also known as "ex ante ...
  10. Can’t find what you’re looking for?

    Help us improve DuckDuckGo searches with your feedback

Custom date rangeX